Jo Vermeulen wrote:

kony wrote:

On Sat, 3 Jan 2004 14:40:46 -0500, "Jean" wrote:


"On the contrary, the ATI Radeon 9200 card is very good in 3D


You must be joking !!!!




It's true... compared to a Matrox G450 or older.


Indeed, that's what I meant :-)

It doesn't sound like he needs blazing 3D speed though, a Radeon 9200
or 9600 might be ideal for the purpose.


You are right. I don't need a very fast card. I occassionaly play games
(e.g. Max Payne, FIFA 2003, GTA 3, Midnight Club, ...). My Geforce 2 MX
card was good enough for that purpose.

I don't even need the performance of an Radeon 9200. It just want to
keep playing the games I played before. But I don't know if any of the
Matrox cards is capable of the 3D performance of my old Geforce 2 MX 400
(not considering the Parhelia, which is way out of my budget).

Maybe the G550 or P650 are?

Just found this:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=ma...ews.com&rnum=2

quote
Seriously, from what I've read, you won't see much improvement in 2D
performance or image quality. 3D gets the biggest boost. The G450 is
like a TNT 2 ultra but the G550's 3D performace is close to a GeForce 2 MX.
/quote

So apparantly the G550 is as good as my Geforce2 MX )

Does anybody know how the P650 compares?

Kind regards,

--
Jo Vermeulen
Student Computer Science at the tUL
email:
www: http://lumumba.luc.ac.be/jo