View Single Post
  #8  
Old July 21st 03, 03:33 AM
Darthy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 27 Jun 2003 00:20:39 -0500, OverKlocker
wrote:


i'm all for doin' research... i got these from the most recient
articles on those sites. (aint got time to check them ALL out...LOL)
if ya got a link, please post it. if it appears to be a good review
site, i'll keep it in mind for further research.


here is a recently made and very good comparison chart of the 440mx up
to the 9600 / 5900.


http://www.tomshardware.com/graphic/..._guide-12.html


(80 page video cardS review) ouch!

The IMPORTANT thing about ALL these cards as of today...

256mb versions are ALL WASTE OF MONEY - or bragging rights.

Both ATI & Nvidia chips have showno 0% improvement in performance.

Whats sad is that the 9600ATI is for sure, a slower card than the 9500
(but cheaper to make and sell).


--
Remember when real men used Real computers!?
When 512K of video RAM was a lot!

Death to Palladium & WPA!!