View Single Post
  #5  
Old December 31st 06, 12:28 PM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Vista and Graphics - Is Matrox really that good for text? - Please enlighten me

Make sure you're using a DVI cable (not analog) and that
your resolution is native for that monitor. Experiment with
different refresh rates and see if it makes any difference.

"John Smith" wrote in message . ..
Dell Dell UltraSharp 2405FPW - 1920 x 1200 - the monitor is listed as
generic PNP in windows since I doubt that Dell has a vista driver.

Running with the Matrox card under XP w/the same monitor had better text,
pristine almost and no issue w/refresh of graphics objects in emails.




wrote in message
om...
"John Smith" wrote in message
. ..
I have been using Matrox cards since the early 1990s. My sole reason is
their superlative text quality.

I just built a new PC based on the PCI-e spec running Windows Vista. I
have
Vista Enterprise thru my company.

Because I wanted to run the Vista Aero color scheme, I opted for a card
that
has 256 mb of memory - an excellent card from Gigabyte that uses the
NVidia
7600GT engine - GIGA N 7600GT GV-NX76T256D-RH R

I can only say that compared w/my Matrox 650 and before that 550 and
before
that 450 and before that the Mystique, the text on this card is blurry.
Its
not even close. The only way is was even marginally acceptable was to
turn
on cleartype which I have always disliked.

I just don't get it especially since the Matrix 650 PCIe card w/128mb is
based on the NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT chipset (according to CNet).


What monitor are you using, and at what resolutions/refresh rates?