I knew that... and you know what it's all bull****.

The screen quality is the same at least for my HP L2335 monitor.

The only two things which are better a

1. Higher/native resolution possible: 1920x1200 for dvi compared to
1920x1024 for analog/vga.

2. Auto resize works perfeclty in DVI.

Bye,
Skybuck.

"John" wrote in message
...
You must be the only one in town that didn't know that DVI was better than
analog for LCD.....
..
Another thing, maybe you didn't know it ... but a response time of 16ms
for a gaming monitor is not really good.....




"Skybuck" wrote in message
oups.com...
Hello,

I just installed Civilization 3 Conquest on my Dream PC 2006 and I
immediatly noticed the improvement when using DVI... actually I have
been noticing it the whole time but this time I especially noticed it


The good thing about DVI is that resolution auto-resizing and
auto-adjusting is no longer really necessary. With analog sometimes the
auto-resize failed... so then I had to push the auto button... and then
it went flickering and adjusting etc.. .which was kinda annoying.

That's now completely gone... IT'S SO RELAXING I love it Yeah well
at least for me since I simply have one to one mode on... I don't know
what happens when scaling is on it probably will be relaxed as well...

The last couple of days with the monitor and the DVI (digital) signal
on have been ultra relaxing !!!

I highly recommend making sure you get DVI (digital) graphics cards and
cables and lcd monitors/support etc etc etc =DDD **** YEAH I LOVE IT
!!!! =D

Bye,
Skybuck.