View Single Post
  #5  
Old December 19th 07, 12:22 AM posted to alt.comp.periphs.videocards.ati,alt.comp.hardware.amd.x86-64,alt.comp.periphs.videocards.nvidia,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.video
First of One[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,284
Default F@#K. AMD conceeds highend graphics market to Nvidia in 2008 - no ATI R700 series until 2009

Always the optimist, to think there's some untapped potential in the 2xxx
and 3xxx cards. :-)

The 2xxx and 3xxx cards are fundamentally slow because
1) they lack a hardware AA resolver and
2) their raw fillrate [~ 24 Gtexel/sec] is significantly less than the
competing 8800 designs [~ 37 Gtexel/sec for GTX].

In fact, the drivers are quite efficient. Look he
http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3151&p=9
Year's worth of driver optimizations and the X1950XTX is now pulling
almost twice the framerate of the 7950GT in Bioshock, Crysis and UT3, and
this is in Vista.

--
"War is the continuation of politics by other means.
It can therefore be said that politics is war without
bloodshed while war is politics with bloodshed."

"Mike Ray" wrote in message
...
It might be a good idea for ATI to spend some time on drivers! They might
get a real boost (from just better software) from 2xxx and 3xxx cards
already being sold. Seems the hardware is always ahead of drivers.

Bottom Line - If ATI was known for great stable drivers they would not
need the latest, greatest hardware.