View Single Post
  #4  
Old January 21st 04, 11:58 PM
BelaLvgosi
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Patch" wrote in message
news[email protected]

"bigmike" wrote in message
. net...
Hi,

I have Diskeeper and Norton Systemworks 2003 on my PC. I am using XP

Pro.
If I defrag with Diskeeper (which will tell me drive is done) and then

use
Norton Speedisk, Norton will run for a long while before it says the

drive
is defragmented. If I run Norton first and then use Diskeeper,

Diskeeper
will only run a short while and then say the drive is done. Which one

do
you guys think does a more thorough job because mine are both trial

versions
and I have to pay for one sooner or later. Does Norton do a better job

or
just take a lot longer than Diskeeper to do the same thing?

Mike


Diskeeper is a keeper!



PerfectDisk, as it optimizes swap file position (putting it in the middle of
the disk) unlike Diskeeper that only defrags it and throws it in the first
available space it sees.