"Patch" wrote in message
"bigmike" wrote in message
I have Diskeeper and Norton Systemworks 2003 on my PC. I am using XP
If I defrag with Diskeeper (which will tell me drive is done) and then
Norton Speedisk, Norton will run for a long while before it says the
is defragmented. If I run Norton first and then use Diskeeper,
will only run a short while and then say the drive is done. Which one
you guys think does a more thorough job because mine are both trial
and I have to pay for one sooner or later. Does Norton do a better job
just take a lot longer than Diskeeper to do the same thing?
Diskeeper is a keeper!
PerfectDisk, as it optimizes swap file position (putting it in the middle of
the disk) unlike Diskeeper that only defrags it and throws it in the first
available space it sees.