This just in.. At "optimal quality" I got 6066. I guess not a big drop
considering 16xAF, 2xAA quality.

Compaired to "high quality" 6252, "default" 6320, and "optimal performance"
6324.

Oh and card runs at 250/250 @ 254/254
What do you say?


"Glenn" wrote in message
...
The last time I bm'd a card at default and then performance setting was
with
a 9600xt a week or so ago. the difference wasn't much (can't remember
exactly) maybe no more than a hundred? I am not surprised to see the
difference in your card. For some comparison though, try it at quality
settings. The 9600xt went from around 11600 to 4300?


Glenn

"Asestar" )_nospam_ wrote in message
...
I ran standard becnhmarks with r8500le 64mb, using cat4.1., 256mb agp
apperture, agp4x.

In "3Ddirect3d" i set slider to "default" (high quality texture. and
mipmap), the result was 6320.
I set now to "maximum performance" (performance texture and mipmap), the
result came 6324.

That's only 4 marks difference? Is it normal?


I'm on duron1,3GHz, pc133 sdram, win-xp pro, dx9.0b, abit kt7A mobo.





---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.577 / Virus Database: 366 - Release Date: 03/02/2004