View Single Post
  #6  
Old September 12th 03, 01:38 PM
SST
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In looking at reviews of current games, The Ti4200 actually beats the 9600p
in many places. It also seems to get beat out by many of the other
competitive cards.
However, in reality this is quite opposite!! (so reports the users)
http://www6.tomshardware.com/graphic...n_9600-07.html

Also, in new DX9 games like HF2 the 9600p outperforms nVidias $500
5900ultra, what's that all about? Their is going to be very many unhappy
nVidia owners by years end. Get your ATI now before the demand goes up



"Crash7" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 00:40:38 GMT, "SST" wrote:

I replaced a clients Ti4600 with a Radeon 9600Pro (the Ti4600 died just
after a year!) for allot less then the cost of the Ti4600 new and still

less
after all this time.

Client reports back that the 9600p seems faster, feels smoother and looks
better in 3D. They are very happy with the switch. Apparently it

'benches'
less then it actually performs in the real world.


Actually, I think you've got this reversed. It's not that the 9600p
benches less than it performs. It's that the Nvidia cards do the
opposite. There's a reason for that.


Crash7
remove x's from address to email