View Single Post
  #9  
Old November 1st 04, 12:37 AM
John Doe
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Troll.

Shep© wrote:

Path: newssvr30.news.prodigy.com!newssvr11.news.prodigy. com!newscon03.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01a.news.pro digy.com!prodigy.com!news.glorb.com!news.addix.net !fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From: Shep¸
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt
Subject: Ram: more vs. speed?
Date: Mon, 01 Nov 2004 00:08:06 +0000
Lines: 25
Message-ID:
References:
Reply-To:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: news.uni-berlin.de 2WMKgymvez6BNalrFhvBQQFdocdexxSfWqSSTAJ7BPxoWGrWI=
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.553
Xref: newsmst01a.news.prodigy.com alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:420881

On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 06:57:56 GMT There I was minding my own business
and then John Doe wrote :

"MustKillMoe-Wheee!" wrote:

My friend has 128mb at pc2100. I want to buy him a 512 pc2700 that's on
sale. Should I take out the 2100 ram entirely?


If he is using Windows XP, maybe not.

If he is using Windows 98 or Millennium, then he won't be able to use more
than 512MB anyway.


********!!!!!
Another idiot post.



--
Free Windows/PC help,
http://www.geocities.com/sheppola/trouble.html
remove obvious to reply
email
Free original songs to download and,"BURN" :O)
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/8/nomessiahsmusic.htm