On 9/16/2003 12:59 PM Lars A befouled our nation with:

And with 51.75 I got a 4.7% increase of FPS, a 5.3% increase of GFX per
second, but a 1.2% decrease in CPU.

Sco 16227 (CPU: 10007, GFX: 1767)

Lars A



"Lars A" skrev i meddelandet
news:XmJ9b.4481$P51.6154@amstwist00...


mobo ASUS P4C800-E
detonator 45.23
FX5600 not Ultra version

Sco 15499
CPU: 10131 (OC'd bus=880mhz)
GFX: 1677

will mow install 51.75 and check what happens.


Lars A










With my XP2500/GF3 Ti500 45.23, I get:
GFX sco 1581
CPU sco 4121

AquaMark sco 13066

http://arc.aquamark3.com/arc/arc_vie...unID=186478789

The GFX score difference between a FX 5600 and a two year old card is
only 90 pts. What exactly does that mean? Probably that I won't be
buying an FX 5600. The best Radeon 9600 (with approximately my
processor) scores seem to be pushing 30000 total.

--
Scientific American recently corrected an April news story that contended that, in one study, cloned pigs had variable numbers of teeth. In fact, they had variable numbers of teats.

Steve [Inglo]