|
|
GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR
.. ========================================
GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ====================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ====================== |
In article t.com, smh wrote:
.. ======================================== GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. Where the hell in any of my posts did i ever break a NDA????? Nothing i posted was copywrited, protected,NDA type syuff. I never posted any fraudulent results. Sue me you pussy!!!! DO NOT use my posts in ANY of your rants from now one. or i'll personally make it a jihad of mine to make sure you have no usenet access from any paid souces again. BTW, why do you refuse in your posts to name the other person related to my posts. In other words you made most of what is there up. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using an ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ====================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ====================== |
Mikey Richter (Lying Scum) on NDA: (Excerpted) ================================================== ============== From: smh Subject: Adaptec TakeTwo: === Response to Mike Richter === Date: 11/28/99 Mike Richter (Acraptec Shill) wrote: When you returned after a hiatus (or an exile as somebody called it), you shouted very excitedly what a wonderful product Take Two is and further added that it alone is worth the price of ECDC4, and it did backup your system just wonderfully. When Adaptec ****ed up almost all the functionality of ECDC4, your suggestion that Take Two is bug free was hard to take. Sorry about that. I report what I know and what I can subject to NDA. You can take the NDA and shove it up to you know where. I will not violate my word in the NDA on beta results. One more time: Take that NDA and shove it up to you know where. ================================================== ============== ======================================== GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ===================================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ===================================== |
Just ignore him GMAN, smh is the resident physcopatchic stalker,
bull****ter and all round basket case. No one takes any notice of his rants so theres no point in replying as you wont get a coherant answer or one shred of proof to back his claims. In article , said... In article t.com, smh wrote: .. ======================================== GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. Where the hell in any of my posts did i ever break a NDA????? Nothing i posted was copywrited, protected,NDA type syuff. I never posted any fraudulent results. Sue me you pussy!!!! DO NOT use my posts in ANY of your rants from now one. or i'll personally make it a jihad of mine to make sure you have no usenet access from any paid souces again. BTW, why do you refuse in your posts to name the other person related to my posts. In other words you made most of what is there up. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using an ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. |
Adrian Miller (Acraptec) on NDA: ======================= From: Adrian Miller (Acraptec) Subject: Adaptec 4.0 Take Two Date: 11/24/99 Do you know whether beta testers reported any cases where system were not restored properly? That sort of info is covered by the NDA, which I have signed as well. ======================= From: Adrian Miller (Acraptec) Subject: Adrian Miller, why do you not respond to these? Date: 3/12/01 Why don't you respond to these: ------------------------------------ Easy CD Creator 5 does not do Mode 1 ------------------------------------ NDA You are the weakest link, good-bye. ======================= . ======================================== GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ====================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ====================== |
========================================
GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. Mikey Richter (Lying Scum) on NDA: (Excerpted) ================================================== ============== From: smh Subject: Adaptec TakeTwo: === Response to Mike Richter === Date: 11/28/99 Mike Richter (Acraptec Shill) wrote: When you returned after a hiatus (or an exile as somebody called it), you shouted very excitedly what a wonderful product Take Two is and further added that it alone is worth the price of ECDC4, and it did backup your system just wonderfully. When Adaptec ****ed up almost all the functionality of ECDC4, your suggestion that Take Two is bug free was hard to take. Sorry about that. I report what I know and what I can subject to NDA. You can take the NDA and shove it up to you know where. I will not violate my word in the NDA on beta results. One more time: Take that NDA and shove it up to you know where. ================================================== ============== (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ===================================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ===================================== |
========================================
GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. Adrian Miller (Acraptec) on NDA: ======================= From: Adrian Miller (Acraptec) Subject: Adaptec 4.0 Take Two Date: 11/24/99 Do you know whether beta testers reported any cases where system were not restored properly? That sort of info is covered by the NDA, which I have signed as well. ======================= From: Adrian Miller (Acraptec) Subject: Adrian Miller, why do you not respond to these? Date: 3/12/01 Why don't you respond to these: ------------------------------------ Easy CD Creator 5 does not do Mode 1 ------------------------------------ NDA You are the weakest link, good-bye. ======================= (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ====================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ====================== |
========================================
GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= Not detected the bug because testers were using SCSI based drives? ======================= From: Adrian Miller (Acraptec) Subject: 8X disk to disk, is it possible? Date: 11/22/99 I want to do disk to disk at 8X if possible, Easy Cd Creator 4.0 tells me the source drive (a new Pioneer 40X SCSI) is not fast enough and wants to cache to the hdd first then write at 8x, defeating the purpose. As someone else pointed out there is a bug in the systems tests that is going to be addressed shortly. ======================= ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ====================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ====================== |
========================================
GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= Not detected the bug because testers were using Plextors OR scsi? Not detected the bug when even Plextor AND scsi showed the behavior? ======================= From: handercrander Subject: Problems with Easy CD_COPIER 4.0 at 8x Date: 9/22/99 I have a plextor plexwriter 8/2/20 cd-writer, and a ultraplex 40max [SCSI] cdrom With easy cd copier 3.5c I had no problems to copy at 8x speed, but with the new version it "forces" to copy to the harddisk first. The same happens at 6x. I can only copy on the fly at 4x !!! ======================= ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ====================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ====================== |
Usenet Abuse - Continuing Stalking, Harassment, Libel and SPAMMING via
repetitive posting of the same material Thousands of times. http://www.google.com/groups?hl=en&l...8996c14f34816e a9f55808c9ae99b7%40news.usenetrocket.com&rnum=4&pr ev=/groups%3Fq%3Dinsub ject:GMAN%26hl%3Den%26lr%3D%26ie%3DUTF-8%26scoring%3Dr%26selm%3D338996c1 4f34816ea9f55808c9ae99b7%2540news.usenetrocket.com %26rnum%3D4 Additional references to portals that have recently banned this psychotic for Stalking and Harassment should you require additional information. Path: sn-us!sn-xit-01!sn-xit-09!supernews.com!68.6.19.232.MISMATCH!west.cox.ne t!east.cox.net!peer02.cox.net!cox.net!chi1.webusen et.com!news.webusenet. com!newsfeed-east.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.com!news-out.visi.com!petbe. visi.com!newsfeeder2.randori.com!news.randori.com! c01f6b93!not-for-mail Message-ID: From: smh X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.publish.cdrom.software,alt.comp.periphs.cdr,a lt.cd-rom Subject: GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR References: t.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 73 X-Complaints-To: - Please include ALL headers, thanks. Organization: http://www.randori.com Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2003 22:52:21 GMT Xref: sn-us comp.publish.cdrom.softwa111127 alt.comp.periphs.cdr:398368 alt.cd-rom:164576 "smh" wrote in message ... ======================================== GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= Not detected the bug because testers were using SCSI based drives? ======================= From: Adrian Miller (Acraptec) Subject: 8X disk to disk, is it possible? Date: 11/22/99 I want to do disk to disk at 8X if possible, Easy Cd Creator 4.0 tells me the source drive (a new Pioneer 40X SCSI) is not fast enough and wants to cache to the hdd first then write at 8x, defeating the purpose. As someone else pointed out there is a bug in the systems tests that is going to be addressed shortly. ======================= ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 4/18/00 I never in all my testing received that slow of DAE in any of the betas i tested. i have been using a Panasonic 24x scsi drive ======================= GMAN, you are a LIAR: ====================== From: jerry r Subject: CDR 508 ezcreator 4 poor DAE Date: 12/11/99 EZ creator 4 tests show my CDr508 scsi drive at .9x for DAE. (Panasonic CR-508 24x SCSI does DAE @ 8x) ====================== |
Got no time to respond to this, Timmy?
======================= From: Mike DHaire Subject: Easy CD Creator's Timestamp Problem on Windows 2000/XP Date: 3/29/03 Timmy Kroesen ("Net-Trash") wrote: I'd assume other issues take precedence; not much of a bug IMO anyway... How 'bout I nab your penis and smash it with a hammer, mother****er! LOL !!! LOL !!! LOL !!! ======================= Tim Kroesen wrote: Usenet Abuse - Continuing Stalking, Harassment, Libel and SPAMMING via repetitive posting of the same material Thousands of times. ======================================== GMAN (ex Acraptec beta tester) is a LIAR ======================================== 1. Beta testers discussing beta results is in violation of the NDA, according to none other than Mikey Richter. 2. Mike Richter and Adrian Miller allowed GMAN's posts on beta results. 3. Presenting the beta results falsely is a fraud. (See: Roxio, What a Joke - "0.9x" DAE Speed Bug Returns) ======================= From: Adrian Miller Subject: Acraptec Gibberish 101 and === More LIES === Date: 4/7/00 The DAE issue did not show up until after shipping of 4.00. During beta testing all the testers reported DAE speeds in 4.00 similar to what they got in 3.5c. ======================= From: (GMAN) Date: 12/10/02 Why did the Acraptec beta testers not detect the infamous "0.9x" DAE Speed bug? Because none of the beta testers were using a POS ide reader like you were???? As far as i could tell we basically all had either Plextors or scsi based readers and/or burners that didnt show this behavior. ======================= Not detected the bug because testers were using SCSI based drives? ======================= From: Adrian Miller (Acraptec) Subject: 8X disk to disk, is it possible? Date: 11/22/99 I want to do disk to disk at 8X if possible, Easy Cd Creator 4.0 tells me the source drive (a new Pioneer 40X SCSI) is not fast enough and wants to cache to the hdd first then write at 8x, defeating the purpose. As someone else pointed out there is a bug in the systems tests that is going to be addressed shortly. ======================= |
http://www.randori.com/randori/pers_aup.html
Randori's TOS With respect to any content you distribute through your membership: a.) You are solely responsible for your content, and we act as a passive conduit for your online distribution and publication of your information. However, we reserve the right to remove content from our servers if we believe it may create liability for us. b.) You represent and warrant that any content you distribute through your membership: I. does not infringe on any third party's copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other proprietary rights or rights of publicity or privacy; II. does not violate any law, statute, ordinance or regulation (including without limitation the laws and regulations governing export control); III. is not defamatory, trade libelous or unlawfully threatening; IV. does not violate any laws regarding unfair competition, antidiscrimination or false advertising, or V. does not contain viruses, trojan horses, worms, time bombs, cancelbots or other similar harmful or deleterious programming routines. You may not distribute "spam" through your membership, nor may you take any other action which imposes an unreasonable or disproportionately large load on our infrastructure. We deploy automatic word and "spam" filters that may terminate your postings without delivering them. Spam, defined as, but not limited to, commercial messages posted to non-commercial newsgroups, off-topic posts to a newsgroup, or large-scale redundant posts, are not permitted on Randori News. Spamming is not consistent with responsible newsgroup participation and subscriptions of members posting SPAM messages will be terminated with no refund and a possible cleanup charge (see below). We urge you to read the FAQs posted in the news.announce.newusers and news.admin.net-abuse. Abuse of the service, including but not limited to, spamming, trolling, abusing the privileges or harrassment of other subscribers or netizens, or any type of illegal material, such as child-pornography, is completely unacceptable. Use of personal memberships for mass commercial posting, eg, *.jobs, is not allowed. Abuse may occur in many forms and is left up to Randori News to decide. Job postings by commercial recruiters are not allowed on Randori News servers. Principles may post jobs in the appropriate newsgroups only. Other examples of abuse a posting offensive articles in clearly inappropriate newsgroups (e.g., pornographic material posted in Disney or K12 groups), posting harassing and/or potentially libelous messages, also known as trolling, to the Internet using the Randori News servers, attempting to hack into the Randori News servers, posting SPAM, reselling the news, etc. If you violate this term and distribute such content, we may, without prior notice, ban you from any and all services, terminate your registration, delete your messages or postings, and take any other action we deem appropriate in our sole discretion. |
Nice post GMAN!
With it's (SMH) past history, a court could force Randori (or another newsgroup website) to release SMH identity so that legal, criminal action could be taken against it. |
In article , "Harry Tasker" wrote:
Nice post GMAN! With it's (SMH) past history, a court could force Randori (or another newsgroup website) to release SMH identity so that legal, criminal action could be taken against it. I am already heading in that direction Harry!!!!! |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HardwareBanter.com