HardwareBanter

HardwareBanter (http://www.hardwarebanter.com/index.php)
-   Homebuilt PC's (http://www.hardwarebanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=36)
-   -   USB4 article (http://www.hardwarebanter.com/showthread.php?t=199693)

Shadow[_2_] September 7th 19 05:50 PM

USB4 article
 

https://www.techradar.com/news/usb4-...u-need-to-know

Will I need it?
Probably not for the next 3-4 years.
[]'s
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

Paul[_28_] September 7th 19 07:01 PM

USB4 article
 
Shadow wrote:
https://www.techradar.com/news/usb4-...u-need-to-know

Will I need it?
Probably not for the next 3-4 years.
[]'s


At some point, your processor can't keep up.

There are limits as to how fast things work currently.

Presumably the logic block will be powered down
when you're not using it. That would be nice.

No, I won't be buying a card with a Thunderbolt
controller on it, just for this reason.

Currently, you can buy an adapter housing for an NVMe
that runs at 1GB/sec and has a USB 3.x interface on it.
Which is pretty decent.

Macrium would not run with the 1GB/sec device, at 1GB/sec.
Since Macrium computes a checksum (could be MD5), that
tends to be the rate-limiting step.

But useless benchmarks will benefit from your new hardware.

Which is good in some circles. (Benchmark club, Computer club)

During a benchmark, the deposit of read data in RAM is
ignored, and only the "done" bit is checked. That's how
a benchmark can run that much faster, by not having to
"plow" through the actual data. DMA transfer puts it in
memory. Any process that actually deals with the data,
would rate limit what you're doing.

Paul



s|b September 7th 19 09:42 PM

USB4 article
 
On Sat, 07 Sep 2019 13:50:40 -0300, Shadow wrote:

Will I need it?
Probably not for the next 3-4 years.


But will you /want/ it?

--
s|b

Ant[_3_] September 7th 19 10:47 PM

USB4 article
 
I'm still using USB(1-3) at home. :/
--
Colony is currently infected/sick with a nasty flu! It came early too. :(
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org /
/ /\ /\ \ http://antfarm.ma.cx. Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.
| |o o| |
\ _ /
( )

Shadow[_2_] September 8th 19 03:38 AM

USB4 article
 
On Sat, 07 Sep 2019 22:42:09 +0200, "s|b" wrote:

On Sat, 07 Sep 2019 13:50:40 -0300, Shadow wrote:

Will I need it?
Probably not for the next 3-4 years.


But will you /want/ it?


Unlikely. Unless they make drivers for XP.
With an adaptor that plugs into my USB3 port? Not much of a
"win" there.
:(
[]'s

PS Maybe on Linux, but my ASUS board will hopefully last
another 5 years or so. (It's just over a year old). USB5 will probably
be the "hype" by then.
--
Don't be evil - Google 2004
We have a new policy - Google 2012

[email protected] September 21st 19 02:33 PM

USB4 article
 
On Sunday, September 8, 2019 at 12:51:49 AM UTC+8, Shadow wrote:

Will I need it?
Probably not for the next 3-4 years.


well MIDI is still on version 1 after more than 30 years.

Paul[_28_] September 21st 19 04:40 PM

USB4 article
 
wrote:
On Sunday, September 8, 2019 at 12:51:49 AM UTC+8, Shadow wrote:
Will I need it?
Probably not for the next 3-4 years.


well MIDI is still on version 1 after more than 30 years.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIDI

"The MIDI 2.0 initiative, announced in January 2019 ...

The new protocol, then tentatively called "HD Protocol" ...
has been researched since 2005
"

The research is going at a blistering pace.

But you can't argue with the results though. Many other
standards bodies make an awful mess when they do things.

Paul


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HardwareBanter.com