Geforce FX 5900 for $169.00 -- is this for real ???
Is this legitimate, or is this some lower level 5900 card (ie., xt or SE
something like that). Is BFG a good brand for the 5900? Here is the link: http://www.compuplus.com/insidepage....k=searchViewed |
"Eric" wrote in message
... Is this legitimate, or is this some lower level 5900 card (ie., xt or SE something like that). Is BFG a good brand for the 5900? Here is the link: http://www.compuplus.com/insidepage....k=searchViewed It looks for real, but the cheapest shipping option is $14.95, so it may not be quite as good as it looks, but still fairly good. |
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:55:59 -0500, "Eric" wrote:
Is this legitimate, or is this some lower level 5900 card (ie., xt or SE something like that). Is BFG a good brand for the 5900? Here is the link: http://www.compuplus.com/insidepage....k=searchViewed I ordered one from here. http://www.buyxtremegear.com/bfg5900128.html Their ad specifically notes the speeds as regular 5900. The SE/SP/XT has slower clocks. Check out the price he http://shop.harddrive.com/cgi-bin/it...01230 9321182 Have a great day, Albert |
Did it come yet -- if so, how is it?
"Albert" wrote in message ... On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:55:59 -0500, "Eric" wrote: Is this legitimate, or is this some lower level 5900 card (ie., xt or SE something like that). Is BFG a good brand for the 5900? Here is the link: http://www.compuplus.com/insidepage....id=1001829&tra ck=searchViewed I ordered one from here. http://www.buyxtremegear.com/bfg5900128.html Their ad specifically notes the speeds as regular 5900. The SE/SP/XT has slower clocks. Check out the price he http://shop.harddrive.com/cgi-bin/it...01230 9321182 Have a great day, Albert |
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:56:43 -0500, "Eric" wrote:
Did it come yet -- if so, how is it? Monday (slow boat). Would you believe the price dropped $6 since I ordered it?? Now I'm really rippin!! I'll be sure to post a warning if it's trash. Have a great day, Albert |
Their ad specifically notes the speeds as regular 5900. The SE/SP/XT has slower clocks. Yes, but SE/SP are normal non-Ultra models, while XT is REALLY slow. |
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 21:18:45 +0100, "MheAd"
wrote: Their ad specifically notes the speeds as regular 5900. The SE/SP/XT has slower clocks. Yes, but SE/SP are normal non-Ultra models, while XT is REALLY slow. MSI SP is clocked slower and has slower ram than their plain normal non-Ultra MSI 5900. SP version has 2.8ns RAMs and the memory clock was @ 750MHz while the TD was @ 2.6ns for 850MHz and Ultra @ 2.2ns for 850MHz Have a great day, Albert |
"Albert" skrev i meddelandet ... On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 21:18:45 +0100, "MheAd" wrote: MSI SP is clocked slower and has slower ram than their plain normal non-Ultra MSI 5900. SP version has 2.8ns RAMs and the memory clock was @ 750MHz while the TD was @ 2.6ns for 850MHz and Ultra @ 2.2ns for 850MHz Ah, okay, but those 5900 cards (SP/SE) still beat Radeon 9700PRO, don't they? |
No. The 9700 Pro beats the 5900 SE/SP/XT in most games by a little. It
really depends on the game though. Dave "MheAd" wrote in message news:GZpQb.1125$O41.64154@amstwist00... Ah, okay, but those 5900 cards (SP/SE) still beat Radeon 9700PRO, don't they? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HardwareBanter.com